Announcing Sourcing as a Service!

Sourcing as a Service accelerates your internal hiring efforts, with customized candidate sourcing for targeted outreach.

We take care of critical yet time-consuming ‘top of funnel’ sourcing tasks for both Hiring Managers and Recruiters freeing your time to pitch and close qualified candidates!

Passive Sourcing- You're Doing It Wrong

Passive Sourcing: You’re Doing It Wrong

Like many folks in the Bay Area, I get a fair number of messages from recruiters and hiring managers who are passively sourcing candidates. And after a while of getting these messages and talking to these people, I’ve come to a conclusion: if you’re passively sourcing, you’re probably doing it wrong.

I may not be interested in leaving RecruitLoop, but I’m not convinced many of you are even trying. And that’s just sad. After all, the whole point of passive sourcing is to find candidates who don’t think they’re interested in leaving their jobs and convince them to give your open role a chance.

Here’s what you’re doing wrong:

You’re sending crappy messages

We’ve talked about this before: Most of your LinkedIn messages suck.

If you send me a generic message that makes me think that you’re bored out of your skull, why would I be anything but bored with what you offer? Spend a little time customizing messages that will get my attention (hint: “my client is looking for candidates exactly like you” without telling me what about me makes me perfect is a dead giveaway that you’re using a template).

You’re not replying

You sent me a (non-sucky) message via LinkedIn. I replied with something that wasn’t “leave me the f*ck alone.” And… Nothing.

You didn’t even bother to respond.

Let me get this straight: You searched for candidates like me. You looked at my profile enough to determine that I’m worth your time to message. I actually replied. And now I’m not worth the time of a quick response? That’s just dumb.

You’re paying too much attention to the first thing I say

I have a usual response I use to any passive sourcing outreach that looks non-spammy: “I’m not looking to leave RecruitLoop right now, but I’m happy to chat. What times work for you?”

Half the time you don’t respond. Another huge percentage of the time, I get, “okay, then no thanks for the call,” messages.

Are you stupid or something? OF COURSE I’m going to say I’m not looking to leave. What do you think a PASSIVE candidate is? If I were looking to leave, I’d be active.

At minimum, you just missed a great networking opportunity; I have a huge network of rockstar marketers and sales folks who tell me when they’re looking for new jobs. And you just missed your chance at an intro. That’s assuming you can’t entice me into applying for your role!

You’re not even trying to sell

You’re one of the few who hasn’t been enough of a yutz to spam me or fail to reply, and we’ve gotten to the phone call. Congratulations!

Sadly, nearly everyone else drops the ball on the phone call. You usually fall into one of two camps: you decide to interview me, or you pre-disqualify me based on lack of interest.

I hate the first one the most. I’m not looking for an job, and I told you that. Getting on the phone and immediately grilling me like it’s a phone screen is a huge mistake. Why? Because I don’t even know if I want the job. Hell, I probably don’t even know enough about the company and the role to make an intelligent decision one way or the other. If you start grilling me on the phone, I’m going to try to end the call as soon as possible. I won’t refer candidates to you, either.

The second one drives me nuts from a sales perspective. If one of our salesfolks started a call with a prospect by saying, “Well, I know you’re not actually interested in using RecruitLoop, so I’ll just tell you a little bit about it and then stop wasting your time,” I would POUND HIM INTO THE GROUND. Ahem. Starting the conversation saying, “I know you said you’re not looking, but this is so exciting I think you might change your mind,” is a much better intro. It might even get you somewhere.

You’re not following up

If it’s not clear yet, I’m trying to say that reaching out to passive candidates is, frankly, a sales job. And the key to most sales is the follow-up. If you’re not following up you’re not really trying.

I realize this isn’t true all the time. Sometimes you end up filling the role quickly and don’t need to follow up with me for this particular role. But if you’re having a tough time filling a role, why haven’t you followed up with me? I’m probably not going to have this job for the rest of my career, and you never know when my mind might change. Or maybe the sell job you did in our first call intrigued me. You’ll never know if you don’t follow up.

* * *

I realize you’re not all doing this wrong. I know some recruiters who are amazing passive sourcers. They understand that passive sourcing is fundamentally about sales and building relationships, so they can get candidates who aren’t looking to leave their jobs interested in other roles. If you stop doing passive sourcing wrong, maybe you can, too.

Head of Growth at RecruitLoop. Previously at Amazon & HubSpot. Passionate about growing humans and companies, working out, and wine. Also blogs on leadership at Follow her @jennsteele.

  • 5 good messages will outperform 100 crappy messages every time.